Home ~ About us ~ Ahead of print ~ Current Issue ~ Back Issues ~ Search ~ Instructions ~ Subscription ~ Advertise ~ Feedback ~ Login  
  Mens Sana Monographs
A Monograph Series Devoted To The Understanding Of Medicine, Mental Health, Man, Mind, Music And Their Matrix
 Why MSM | Acknowledgement | Call for papers... | Forthcoming MSM...  Users online: 195  Home Email this article Print this Article Bookmark this page Decrease font size Default font size Increase font size 

    Article Cited by others


Reviewer index: A new proposal of rewarding the reviewer

Kachewar Sushil Ghanshyam, Sankaye Smita Balwant

Year : 2013| Volume: 11| Issue : 1 | Page no: 274-284

   This article has been cited by
1 Editorial Misconduct—Definition, Cases, and Causes
Matan Shelomi
Publications. 2014; 2(2): 51
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
2 Advancing Kinesiology Through Improved Peer Review
Duane V. Knudson,James R. Morrow,Jerry R. Thomas
Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 2014; 85(2): 127
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
3 The Editoræs Role as a Harriet Shaw Weaver
Kun Hwang
Archives of Plastic Surgery. 2014; 41(2): 109
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
4 The editoræs role as a Harriet Shaw Weaver
Hwang K
Archives of Plastic Surgery. 2014; 41(2): 109-110
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar]
5 Appropriate Roles for the Subscriber, Publisher, Editor, Author, and Reviewer in the Archives of Plastic Surgery
Kun Hwang
Archives of Plastic Surgery. 2013; 40(6): 663
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
6 Free for Service: The Inadequate Incentives for Quality Peer Review
Joseph Bernstein
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®. 2013; 471(10): 3093
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]


Read this article